![]() ![]() This meant more money for the studios, as they could slap a higher price tag on the album (more content, higher price).Īlso, i suspect the studios wanted the CD singles to pull a dodo for a long time, as they basically was the same physical costs as a album (same size physical media) but with less content and so could not really carry the same price tag (end result, less of a profit). End result was that the single as a product went poof, while the album stayed, but became more and more a collection of individual songs of often random quality (with the highest quality ones being the radio/mtv promos). With the CD however, the two kinda merged as one could jump to whatever song one wanted. This makes singles interesting for specific songs, while albums becomes a coherent whole in two parts. With LP and similar, it was harder to select the exact song you wanted to hear. ![]() Some of pink floyds creations are more modular then others.Īs for creating whole albums vs song collections, this depends, imo, on when the artist/band got started. We wouldn't be surprised to see Dark Side of the Moon come back to iTunes with every track marked "Album only." This doesn't mean they wouldn't become available again as full-album purchases, though-iTunes, for example, regularly offers albums that have one or two tracks that only come with a full album purchase. Get 'em while they're hot.) In addition, EMI must pay Pink Floyd an undisclosed amount in royalty payments. (As of this writing, the albums with per-track purchases were still available. The High Court ordered EMI to pay £40,000 in court costs with the possibility of future damages and EMI may have to pull Pink Floyd's individual offerings from places like the iTunes Store and Amazon MP3. Indeed, as EMI has discovered, that still appears to be the case, at least when it comes to Pink Floyd. ![]() Those who only listened to select tracks were totally missing out. It's unsurprising then that the contract stipulated for the label to maintain the artistic integrity of the album itself-back then (and today as well, but perhaps to a lesser degree), musicians spent painstaking amounts of time crafting the entire album as a whole artwork. When Pink Floyd signed with EMI back in the late '60s, its members probably did not imagine an age when we would be ditching physical media en masse in favor of cherry-picked songs on a series of Internet tubes. The British High Court has ruled against EMI, the band's record label, saying that the band's contract requires EMI to "preserve the artistic integrity of the albums." In this case, that means keeping all the tracks together and in the order they were meant to be in, leading some to worry whether Pink Floyd's music will disappear from popular online music stores altogether. Individual Pink Floyd songs will soon disappear from online music stores. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |